About Me

Name: Silvio Canto, Jr.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Happy birthday Pres. Ford

 
Some of us are old enough to remember August 9, 1974. At noon, Gerald Ford became the 38th president of the US following Pres. Nixon's resignation.

On Friday, Pres. Ford celebrated his 93rd birthday (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/14/politics/main1805523.shtml)

Ford had a short but consequential presidency. He lost a close election to Jimmy Carter in '76. (http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/1102.html#article)

I can still remember the 1976 election night. Carter got off to an early start but Ford made a great comeback as the election moved west. Finally, Carter went over the electoral college early morning and Ford conceded around noon.

Ford's most important accomplishment was to restore integrity and a sense of normalcy to the country after Watergate.

Happy # 93 to a very decent man.

In retrospect, the failed Carter presidency made Reagan possible, and the Republican domination of politics.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What about Iran?

 
So far, I support Pres. Bush's diplomatic approach vis-a-vis Iran. However, there is a limit with people who are committed to destroying Israel and funding terrorists.

The UN is not serious about problems. We saw this in Iraq, North Korea and now Iran.

Pres. Bush must make a tough decision about Iran, which is at the root of the Middle East problems. They are the source of money and represent the single greatest threat to the US.

I believe that Pres. Bush has already made that decision.

Robert Kagan is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and transatlantic fellow at the German Marshall Fund.

Today, he wrote "On Iran, Giving Futility Its Chance":

"Let's imagine, and this is purely hypothetical, that President Bush has already decided that he will not leave office in January 2009 without a satisfactory resolution of the Iranian nuclear problem.

Let's imagine that he has already determined that if he cannot obtain Iran's agreement to dismantle its nuclear weapons program voluntarily and verifiably, then he will order some form of military action to destroy as much of that program as possible before he leaves.

Let's imagine that he has resolved not to end his two terms in office the way Bill Clinton ended his, by leaving every major international crisis -- from Iraq to Iran to North Korea to al-Qaeda -- for his successor.

Let's say, just for the sake of argument, that Bush had made such a decision.

What would he be doing right now? The answer is that he might be doing exactly what he is doing." (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/12/AR2006071201874.html)

Let me say it again. We will be taking military action against Iran.

It won't be easy or pretty. However, it won't be pretty or easy either if we are hit by terrorists with WMDs funded by Iran.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let's support Israel

 
I agree with The Chicago Sun-Times:

"the world needs to support Israel in its fight against terrorism and must condemn most harshly this act of war by Hezbollah and its Syrian and Iranian masters. Their intention is to destabilize further a region that is crying out for pacification."

Israel is going to the source. Simply put, Israel is attacking a terrorist racket that goes from Gaza through Damascus and all the way to Tehran.

Pres. Bush said that Israel has the right to defend itself. They do.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Democrats' new campaign video

 
On a personal level, I think that soldiers, and specially the fallen, are outside of political partisanship.

This is why I despise demonstrations at funerals.

This is why I believe that the NY Times has been unfair in its treatment of the US soldier. The NY Times will run story after story about the mistakes of a handful and will avoid any coverage of the good work done by the thousands who have served in Iraq.

Speaking of our soldiers in Iraq, you won't read this one on the front page of the NY Times. Check out The Power Line's " What We're Really Doing In Iraq"! (http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014663.php)

The US military is doing a good job training a new Iraqi army. Check "A Huge Step in Iraq"

"Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell held a press briefing today discussing the impending turnover of security forces in the Muthanna province in southern Iraq. Caldwell described it as a "huge step", and I don't think that's in any way an overstatement." (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/blog/2006/07/a_huge_step_in_iraq.html)

People can agree or disagree with the war. The soldier is out of bounds.

The Democrats have a new video showing coffins of dead US soldiers. You can see it a various blogs and websites. (video by the DCCC)

This video will turn off most Americans and please the antiwar left. Beyond the video's lack of good taste, it presents the modern Democrat party better than any Republican speech.

As usual, this tactic will blow up in the Democrats' face.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive